Hi experts,
I'm struggling to understand the significance of the entries in /sapsll/tcomca. I had thought only those part of the bp address assigned would be considered for screening but it looks like that is not the case...
We have configured SPL to screen on the name, street, city and country ( in the step control structure for address -> detail control step )
in the subsequent step (assign address field) we selected the fields NAME1, NAME2, STREET, CITY1 and COUNTRY elements from ADRC, (but not the NAME_CO or NAME3.)
For the Name to match we have set the minimum similarity 'Originating Feature' to 60% and the Base Value to 'Number of terms in each SPL List Name or Partner Name;.
The problem is when we generate the search terms for the BP it also includes any entries in NAME_CO or NAME3 in Index Type N1, and this results in the BP Divisor being 4 instead of 1.
Example (from BP - ADRC):
NAME1: NUDT
NAME_CO : John Smith
NAME 3: Division
The corresponding SPL entry we should be matching against is 'National University of Defense Technology (NUDT)' which has 5 search terms after ignoring the of.
When we compare the BP Search term match against the SPL, we get one hit (NUDT) against the 5 SPL Terms, so it's 20% therefore not a hit (<60%)
When we compare the SPL Search terms against the BP we also get one hit against 4 terms, so it's 25% also not a hit. (<60%).
Other than writing a custom program to remove the NAME_CO and NAME3 Search terms from the /sapsll/adrcmp table or some other custom intervention , does anyone have any suggestions on how to overcome this thru configuration etc.
thanks!
Peter
